Blog

/static/1fc92b9595123be6a493281c386fcbb5/f0df2365900c60d45cced918042773b3.png
blogger image

Posted By: Jay Tiwary

How to build a Minimum Viable Platform using agile

Tech startup ideas start with developing an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) to validate the idea and then scale up to the full-featured product. But the definition of MVP is often confusing and people struggle to strike a balance between the wish list and must-have features of the early product they wish to launch. Most of them agree to adopt agile methodologies and consider the feature list they have prepared as part of Idea exploration as an MVP product. They fail to accept the fact that product development is a process and the final product will come through the journey. "the minimum viable product is that version of a new product which allows a team to collect the maximum amount of validated learning about customers with the least effort."The key aspects are “minimum set of features”, “customer feedback”, “idea validation” and to do so you may develop the smallest thing you can build that delivers customer value. I have had a chance to deal with a number of entrepreneurs and what I noticed is many of them cant enlist an MVP vs Final product which clearly means that they have no idea what could be an MVP and they believe the feature set they have thought of till date as MVP feature list.If you are trying to solve many problems at a time with multiple solutions there are more chances of failing the objective or you may end up delivering a feature-rich product than just MVP. Try to prioritize the features using agile MoSCoW principles, the must-have should have, could have, and won't have. Set a timeline to deliver the product and iterate through the features with an objective to deliver all must-haves and whatever you from the should have's and could have been in the given timeline. The key to doing this is "early launch", "fixed time" and "fixed cost". If you have many problems to solve, go with multiple releases solving one problem at a time. The iteration steps should be:Once you have discovered the feature list you need to develop for your product, setting the priorities of the feature list is important. It's not that easy unless you have a pre-validation of the idea and you clearly know the most important thing to solve the problem and there are features around. Many startups fail because they start building an MVP without proper pre-validation, and end up with products that nobody uses. Agile methodologies is a great help and very close to delivering MVP products, with defined iterations, you can set priorities for each iteration, and building the product in a scalable approach than building in parts that actually doesn't solves the complete problem. The following picture is the right example of choosing the features and scaling it up mvp stagesThe agile iterations and discovering each iteration in retrospectagileiterationsHaving said that an MVP should have just minimum feature however it must have the feature to validate the idea. It cannot have a broken product or a buggy product. A common mistake people make is to assume that the MVP can be really buggy or ugly. This is not the case. While the MVP does not necessarily need to be polished to perfection, it needs to contain a set of required features—ones that work properly and delight the user. If your software is broken or looks unfinished, it will give an awful first impression and deter users.Many entrepreneurs because their overenthusiasm keeps on stacking multiple features leaving the most important tools needed to market the product initially. The feature list of the product must have the right tools to market, maintain, and collecting the analytics, its not just the core features list. Social sharing, promotions, discounts, SEO, analytical tools, affiliate marketing are some tools that must be considered while developing the product. Simultaneously products should be developed on the right tech tools and architecture the way it could be maintained & scale up easily. Many entrepreneurs make these mistakes and end up rewriting in case it doesn't meet the objectives of digital marketeers or has been badly architected.Hire the right set of people at the right time, create a team to create the value proposition together not doing in bits and pieces. Most of the early startups fail to understand the importance of different aspects of the product and just focus on one thing which is available to them. Freelancing platforms have given access to hiring developers of budgetary choice which may not be sufficient to build or vision the product and build the product on the right architecture to scale up. Yes, it is MVP that doesn't mean it cannot be scaled, it should have the right standard practices involved from day one which actually helps to deliver to maintain the product for a longer run. The validation of idea in a given timeline and demographic sometimes could be misleading and could take time and needs multiple releases to really understand the impact. Build a product that gives you sufficient tools to market, analyze, maintain & scale.Hire a team considering all the aspects mentioned above, trust me it not going to cost much, it could have some cost involved but it reduces the chances of failure. Choose a team or individuals who understand agile right, MVP right, define your process and timelines, launch as early as possible and then keep updating based on the constant feedback. Icodelabs has the right people have worked with many startups, contact the team to help you to build the right way.
/static/868daeec2e79d57ac901444734dac687/7decadf712446fb7b0dcfab2cb1f88bc.png
blogger image

Posted By: Jay Tiwary

Cross Platform Mobile apps React Native Vs Flutter

Cross-platform mobile app development is at a great pace and so as the needs of technology. When it comes to choosing the right technology to develop your cross-platform app the debate is between React Native and Flutter. Let's take a look into where they stand in 2020 as Flutter has spent a few years and with React Native has dominated the segment since 2015.React Native architecture relies on the JS runtime environment architecture, known as JavaScript bridge. It uses Facebook's Flux/Redux architecture a unidirectional flow of data to manage the app state. Flutter, on the other hand, uses Dart framework which does not necessarily require a bridge for communicating with native modules. Flutter relies on the Flutter engine which implements Flutter core libraries that include animation and graphics, file and network I/O, plugin architecture, accessibility support, and a dart runtime for developing, compiling, and running Flutter applications. It takes Google's open-source graphics library, Skia, to render low-level graphics. Results: Both come with a strong architectural background, Flux and Redux are already a proven architecture and has been adopted by many of the frameworks. Flutter framework comes with numerous native components in the framework itself and does not need a bridge for communicating with native components. However, Flutter architecture gives more confidence in the way it is composed.React Native uses JavaScript for building cross-platform applications. It is mainly used with React besides other famous JavaScript frameworks. This makes it extremely easy for web developers to get started with their mobile app journey. On the other hand, Flutter uses the Dart programming language. In comparison its a fairly new language and needs much recognition. However, it is a fully object-oriented and strongly typed language with also used modern programming syntax. Developers coming from Java or C# find much easier to use. Results: The choice of language depends on the familiarity of the developer. With javascript familiarity is much more for the web developers or developers working on javascript based frameworks it is much easier to work. If you come from a strongly typed and object-oriented language background Dart could be a clear choice.React Native has been the most popular choice over the years but with the introduction of Flutter the market has been so competitive and the Flutter has been rapidly growing to catch the React Native market. Look at what Google trends say:Screenshot 2020-07-29 at 9.23.38 AMResults: Flutter has done exceedingly well and has been a tuff competitor to React Native. If the trends continue Flutter is going to surpass React Native for sure.SourceReact Native works by relying on a given system’s native UI components uses bridges to connect. Many of these are dependent on a third party or custom developed libraries. Flutter, on the other hand, offers comprehensive widgets sets, which can be further customized according to the UI design, rendered and managed by the framework’s graphics engine. It offers structural, visual, and interactive widgetsResults – Here Flutter is the winner as its widgets are for both Material Design for Google as well as Cupertino for Apple, making Flutter better than React Native in terms of the user interface.React Native is considered to be one of the most reliable frameworks for building next-gen mobile apps. It is an efficient framework as it reduces the time-frame of development. React Native is Javascript based technology which has been there in the market for a long time which makes the platform easy for developers. Flutter, on the other hand, has all set of new things, Dart is a new language and could take time to learn. Flutter promises high-quality usability however the development framework demands more recognition over React Native.Results – React Native requires less development time as it provides a faster time to market an app. With react you can use third-party libraries and ready to use components, which reduces development time. Flutter comprises C and C++ libraries which is closer to machine learning and delivers a superior native experience. All the components of Flutter such as User Interface are compiled using C and C++.React Native does not employ native language instead its components are bridged with Javascript to connect each with the native module and perform the required action.Results – Flutter delivers better performance as it makes it easy for mobile app development agencies to reuse the existing code. Its C++ engine works flawlessly and supports the language. React Native is usually supported by the developer community due to its consistency, reliability, and feature-rich functionality for better app performance.Flutter with the release of the 1.12 version looking great and in becoming more stable than the previous version. However, since it has been younger to the market React Native has an edge.Results – React Native guarantees code stability as it uses downward data flow. The developer can easily modify the specific components of the app which then allow better stability and efficient app performance.Google is known for its clear, detailed, and well-formulated documentation and with Flutter, they have continued the expectation. It organizes your code qualitatively making it simple for an enterprise mobility solutions provider.Despite React Native's longer market presence and better market adoption, its documentation isn’t easy to use. The way the elements are organized seems a bit chaotic. Finding exactly what you are looking for is also difficult since it isn’t clearly indicated which components of the framework are still supported and which are already deprecated.Results – Hence, Flutter is the best option as far as documentation is considered when compared to React Native. Conclusion: Both are competitive technologies and both are going to stay but the choice one over the others really depends on multiple factors. If your development team or stack of your products uses Javascript it makes more sense to go with React Native. If you are starting a new platform and love object-oriented and strongly typed language Flutter is the right choice. Flutter delivers better performance over React Native if you are developing an app using a lot of animations of memory consumption Flutter could be a better choice but if you love to see your app with a Native look on the platforms React Native could the choice. If you are looking for a good React Native or Flutter development team contact IcodeLabs and hire a highly performance-oriented team.
/static/aafb6aa44139d9c9798f7ab3582d88dd/034057d21ee5bccf85d7d7c8232161fc.png
blogger image

Posted By: Jay Tiwary

Why Node.js is perfect for web application development

Node.js is an exponential choice for real-time application and has been the top choice of web developers because it represents a “JavaScript everywhere” paradigm, unifying web application development around a single programming language, rather than different languages for server- and client-side scripts. Let's look at what makes Node.js so popular:Node.js is an open-source, a server-side script that runs on the top of Google’s open-source scripting engine V8. Node.js is fast, lightweight, and efficient. It uses the asynchronous mode of operation, event-driven Input/Output rather than using the traditional threads or separate threads for each process.Node.js has transformed an age-old standard which was based on a stateless web & request-response. With Node.js we’ve finally entered into the realm of real-time web applications with two-way connections, where server and client both can start the communication by exchanging the data freely. Node.js was first unveiled in 2009 at the annual European JSConf by Ryan Dahl. Initially, Node.js was sponsored as an open-source project by hosting solutions and cloud computing provider Joyent.The major advantage, of Node.js, is that this JavaScript language doesn’t block I/O – meaning input/output communication method. Though the advantages of this are debatable on a positive side In Non-blocking I/O approach, you can initiate a request in parallel for user2 without waiting for the response to the request for user1. The requests in Node.js can initiate in parallel. This non-blocking I/O eliminates the need for multi-threading.Node.js runs in a single-threaded event loop, that is responsible for abstracting I/O from external requests.Node.js helps enterprises build fast, flexible network applications that can handle parallel connections with high throughput. PayPal has reported 35% less in its response time with double the number of requests received per second after deploying Node.js applications.Node.js provides real-time 2-way communication, communication between the server and the client. And that, in turn, is a model to distribute workloads among service providers (server) and service requests (clients).Web frameworks treat HTTP requests and responses as whole data objects. Node.js very good at handling I/O, So we can take advantage and build some amazing things also. You can transcode an audio and video file while they are uploading. Node.js also can read and write streams to WebSockets so it can read and write streams to HTTP.Javascript has ever since the introduction of DHTML and has been a popular language ever since. Every web developer knows Javascript, this made Node.js easier to adopt and made JavaScript everywhere” paradigm, unifying web application development around a single programming languageNode.js is open-source and free. Node.js comes with NPM (Node Package Manager) which offers libraries that are built by the awesome community which will solve almost all the generic problems related to the Node.js. Npm has packages that are used in our apps to make the development process faster and more efficient.Node.js increases developer efficiency if it has been used as a full-stack development platform. One developer working on frontend and backend both reduces the risk of communications gaps, bugs, and the ability to fix the issues.Node.js is platform-independent and supported by almost operating systems. Node server runs in its process and one can use a proxy server to handle request/response, thus doesn't need any heavy web or application server or any additional infrastructure to run. With the use of NPM modules, the deployment process is quite easy and can be one command deployment.Conclusion: Node.js has been the top choice for Full stack development for the past few years. Javascript based frameworks are doing really well and one of the main reasons behind this growth is Node.js. There is no doubt that Node.js is one of the best choices when it comes to developer server-side API's or any kind of web application, chat applications, media streaming platforms. Node.js is used by some of the big brands and has been a success story for many. Companies like Paypal, User, Google, Facebook, Netflix, Walmart, Uber to name a few to the list of successful Node.js implementations. If you looking for Node.js developers contact IcodeLabs to hire performance-oriented developers at affordable rates.
/static/7f067d0c7f6f7f675d38e49bc895d339/ee616492c6156de55069f3c2c067f1c2.png
blogger image

Posted By: Jay Tiwary

Why DevOps is so important

Over the last decade, the software development industry has opted for Agile methodologies as a major development approach. The iterative and incremental approach seems to be working. Be it Scrum or kanban whichever forms you opt to implement agile the most important thing which has changed is the way we deliver. The ability to deliver incrementally and deliver faster is much more needed.The challenge of delivering quicker and accepting changes simultaneously makes it even more complicated. The need to deliver multiple releases in a month is a very common thing when you are using agile. The manual deployment and delivery process comes to a test when it comes to frequent changes and releases. The automation of deployment and managing the releases make this process better and saves a lot of time.Combining the two verticals Development (responsible to code) and Operations ( responsible for deployment & maintenance) in an organization and making a smoother automated process has led to coining the term Here are the top 5 reasons why one should opt DevOps: DevOps implementation improves delivery time as its all automated. The moment code gets pushed to the repository the CI/CD pipeline is triggered and completes the deployment. In case of failures, the notifications are triggered. The hassle of one team is running after the other is almost zero and your delivery is up and running in no time.The CI/CD pipeline is already tested hence there are very fewer chances of failure. The major deployable units are already set up and tested so the only chances of failure could be at the code level which the dev team can quickly fix without running after the operations team.The complete DevOps process runs as a collaborative service but still, each pipeline stage could be tested beforehand and limits the risk of zero-hour tantrums.The pipelines are written once and stored as yaml statements or integrated tools and hardly need any manual interventions on repeated executions. Hence it needs fewer man-hours which means increased productivity and cost-saving...A win-win for both clients and development teams.Organizations do pillar to post to improve their process. The DevOps is for sure a better process compared to manual deployments raising the standards of delivery. All the stakeholders are added to the notification channel that makes the information channel flow smoother.

Subscribe

To get latest posts update